Patient profile using full CORE-OM (F), CORE Short Form A and B

Download scientific diagram | Patient profile using full CORE-OM (F), CORE Short Form A and B, CORE-10. Reprinted from “Managing Therapy Outcomes with CORE Net,” by G. Mothersole and T. Jordan, 2007, in P. Gray and J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), CORE: A decade of development , pp. 26 –27. Rugby, UK: Penny Gray (publisher). Reprinted with permission. The upper trend line (blue) plots overall psychological distress; the lower trend line (red) plots risk; the dotted line marks the clinical cutoff score for risk. See the online article for the color version of this figure.  from publication: A CORE Approach to Progress Monitoring and Feedback: Enhancing Evidence and Improving Practice | This article describes the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) System and reports on its scientific yield and practice impact. First, we describe the suite of CORE measures, including the centerpiece CORE-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), its short forms, special purpose | Feedback, Systems and Evaluation | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Patient profile using full CORE-OM (F), CORE Short Form A and B

Magnetic core - Wikipedia

PDF) A CORE Approach to Progress Monitoring and Feedback: Enhancing Evidence and Improving Practice

Distributions of CORE-OM (All items) scores in clinical and

William STILES, Professor Emeritus, Ph.D., Miami University, Ohio, MU, Department of Psychology

PDF) Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for

John MELLOR-CLARK, Visiting Professor, MA, BSc, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, BCU, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CHSCR)

Using CORE-34 and other measures – an example from NHS practice

Made to measure: CORE - Therapy Meets Numbers

Resolving the spatial architecture of myeloma and its

William STILES, Professor Emeritus, Ph.D., Miami University, Ohio, MU, Department of Psychology

Made to measure: CORE - Therapy Meets Numbers