Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

$ 16.50

4.9
(99)
In stock
Description

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Vascular Closure Device Update - Endovascular Today

Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

Vascular News 92 – November 2021 by BIBA Publishing - Issuu

Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large-Bore Access Closure after Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - ScienceDirect

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Volume 18 Number 10

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

Built Upon the Perclose™ Legacy

Vascular Closure Devices: The Second Decade Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Past Issues - Vascular News

Frontiers Comparison of percutaneous closure systems for large bore vascular access sites in endovascular procedures