Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)

Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

TiHawk9 – Accelus

James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places

Yan Michael LI, MD PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, MD Anderson

Adjustable Lordotic Expandable Spacers: How Do They Compare to Traditional Static Spacers in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

ProLift® Interbody Spacer System, Spine Products

RISE®-L Expandable Lateral Interbody Spacer

James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places

FlareHawk7 – Accelus

Yan Michael LI, MD PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, MD Anderson

PDF] One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: a VariLift® case series.

Range of motion evaluation from the templating procedure is typically

Cureus, Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders